RoHS Compliance
Other Resources
RoHS Initiatives Worldwide
The EU RoHS Directive (2011/65/EU) is a cornerstone of environmental regulation—since its 2011 update, restricting 10 substances in EEE to protect human health and the environment. Effective since 2006 (revised 2011 and 2015), it spans 11 EEE categories, mandates producer responsibility, and integrates with WEEE for recycling. With global EEE waste projected at 74 million metric tons by 2030, countries like the U.S., China, and Japan, among others, have responded with their own frameworks.
U.S. RoHS Compliance
The U.S. lacks a federal RoHS equivalent, relying on state-level and voluntary measures:
- California RoHS (Electronic Waste Recycling Act, 2003): Restricts four substances (lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium) in video display devices, with thresholds mirroring EU RoHS (e.g., 0.1% lead). Expanded in 2023 to cover more EEE, it's narrower than EU's 11 categories.
- Federal Context: TSCA (1976, amended 2016) manages chemical risks (e.g., PFAS), not EEE-specific substance limits.
Comparison: The U.S.'s fragmented approach lacks EU RoHS's breadth and uniformity, with no federal mandate or 10-substance scope.
Other U.S. states that have enacted RoHS-like and e-waste regulations include Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin.
China RoHS Compliance
"China RoHS" parallels EU RoHS but emphasizes labeling:
- Management Methods for Restriction of Hazardous Substances (2016): Covers six substances (same as original EU RoHS) in electronic information products (EIPs), expanded in 2024 to most EEE. Limits match EU RoHS (e.g., 0.01% cadmium), with mandatory labeling and voluntary compliance testing.
- Scope: Broadens from EIPs to align with EU's 11 categories by 2025.
Comparison: China RoHS mirrors EU RoHS's substance list but prioritizes disclosure over strict market bans, with weaker enforcement.
The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) maintains the database of products that are subject to RoHS restrictions. For more information, see China RoHS vs EU RoHS.
Japan RoHS (J-MOSS) Compliance
Japan focuses on recycling, not restrictions:
- J-MOSS (2006): Voluntary standard for six substances in EEE, aligned with original EU RoHS. Requires labeling if limits (e.g., 0.1% lead) are exceeded, not bans.
- Scope: Covers seven product types, narrower than EU RoHS.
Comparison: Japan's approach is less stringent, prioritizing disclosure over EU RoHS's bans.
Taiwan RoHS Compliance
Taiwan aligns with EU RoHS voluntarily:
- BSMI RoHS (2013, updated 2024): Restricts six substances in EEE, matching EU RoHS limits, with mandatory compliance for certain products (e.g., appliances) since 2024.
- Scope: Narrower than EU's 11 categories, focusing on consumer goods.
Comparison: Taiwan's adoption is partial, lacking full scope and mandatory breadth of EU RoHS.
South Korea RoHS Compliance
South Korea's "Korea RoHS" is robust:
- Act for Resource Recycling (2008, amended 2023): Restricts six substances in EEE (lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, PBB, PBDE), with plans for 10 by 2026. Limits match EU RoHS, requiring producer reporting.
- Scope: Covers EEE like EU RoHS, with recycling integration.
Comparison: Korea RoHS closely resembles EU RoHS, with a phased expansion and strong enforcement.
Norway RoHS Compliance
Norway's RoHS is a direct adoption of EU RoHS:
- Summary: Norway implements the EU RoHS Directive via the Norwegian Product Regulations (Produktforskriften). Overseen by the Norwegian Environment Agency, it ensures EEE compliance through CE marking and producer responsibility, reflecting Norway's EEA membership.
- Scope: Covers all 11 EEE categories as per EU RoHS, restricting 10 substances, with identical exemptions (Annexes III, IV) and integrates with Norway's Waste Regulations for e-waste recycling.
- Comparison: Norway's RoHS is a direct adoption of EU RoHS, matching its substance list, limits, and enforcement.
India RoHS Compliance
India's e-waste rules touch on RoHS principles:
- E-Waste (Management) Rules (2016, amended 2022): Restricts six substances (same as original EU RoHS) in EEE, with 0.1% limits (except 0.01% cadmium). Producers must comply via self-declaration.
- Scope: Covers IT equipment, consumer electronics—narrower than EU RoHS.
Comparison: India's rules align with early EU RoHS but lack the full 10-substance scope and enforcement rigor.
Ukraine RoHS Compliance
Ukraine harmonizes with EU standards:
- Technical Regulation on RoHS (2017): Restricts 10 substances in EEE, mirroring EU RoHS limits and categories. Adopted to align with EU trade agreements, effective 2019.
- Scope: Identical to EU's 11 categories.
Comparison: Ukraine's regulation is a direct EU RoHS adoption, reflecting its EU integration goals.
Singapore RoHS Compliance (SG-RoHS)
Singapore takes a voluntary approach:
- NEA Guidelines (2019): Encourages EU RoHS compliance (six substances) for EEE importers, with no mandatory restrictions or testing.
- Scope: Broad but unspecified, relying on market pressure.
Comparison: Singapore lacks EU RoHS's legal force, aligning via trade rather than regulation.
UAE RoHS Compliance
The UAE aligns closely with EU RoHS:
- UAE RoHS (Cabinet Decision No. 10, 2017): Restricts 10 substances in EEE, matching EU RoHS limits and categories. Requires declarations and technical files for compliance, effective 2020.
- Scope: Covers all EEE, with Emirates Conformity Assessment Scheme (ECAS) certification.
Comparison: UAE RoHS is nearly identical to EU RoHS, tailored for regional trade compliance.
Turkey RoHS Compliance
Turkey adopts EU RoHS directly:
- Regulation on Restriction of Hazardous Substances (2012): Mirrors EU RoHS 2011/65/EU, restricting 10 substances in 11 EEE categories. Requires CE-equivalent compliance for EU market alignment.
- Scope: Identical to EU RoHS.
Comparison: Turkey's regulation is a near-exact replica of EU RoHS, driven by EU candidacy.
Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) RoHS Compliance
The EAEU (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia) mirrors EU RoHS:
- TR EAEU 037/2016: Effective March 2020, restricts six substances (lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, PBB, PBDE) in EEE, with plans to adopt all 10 by 2026. Limits align with EU RoHS, requiring EAC marking.
- Scope: Covers 12 EEE categories, slightly broader than EU's 11.
Comparison: EAEU RoHS closely follows EU RoHS, with minor scope differences and a phased substance expansion.
Iceland RoHS Compliance
Iceland adopts EU RoHS fully:
- Regulation No. 735/2008 (updated 2023): As an EEA member, Iceland implements EU RoHS 2011/65/EU, restricting 10 substances across 11 categories.
- Scope: Identical to EU RoHS.
Comparison: Iceland's regulation is EU RoHS, ensuring seamless compliance.
Brazil RoHS Compliance
Brazil's framework is emerging:
- Decree No. 10,240/2019: Restricts six substances in EEE, aligning with original EU RoHS limits, effective 2023. Focuses on waste management, not production.
- Scope: Limited to consumer electronics.
Comparison: Brazil's regulation is narrower and less enforced than EU RoHS.
Vietnam RoHS Compliance
Vietnam adopts EU RoHS principles:
- Circular 30/2011/TT-BCT (updated 2023): Restricts six substances in EEE, with EU RoHS limits, mandatory since 2024 for importers and manufacturers.
- Scope: Focuses on consumer electronics, not as broad as EU RoHS.
Comparison: Vietnam mirrors early EU RoHS but lacks the full 10-substance scope and category breadth.
Conclusion
The EU RoHS Directive's comprehensive scope and enforcement remain unmatched. The U.S. lags with fragmented or voluntary systems, while China, EAEU, and South Korea approach EU standards with variations. UAE, Turkey, Ukraine, and Iceland closely align, driven by trade ties, whereas India, Japan, and Vietnam adopt partial measures. Harmonizing with EU RoHS while adapting to regional nuances is key to navigating this evolving landscape by 2030.